Comparing coverageĪs you can see from the matrices below, Atomic Red Team has the broadest coverage among the three toolkits.

As such, this article shouldn’t be considered a competitive analysis but an exploration and endorsement of each. Despite their apparent similarities, Atomic Red Team, CALDERA, and Mordor are different in both subtle and overt ways.

For the purposes of this comparison, we’ll judge coverage against MITRE ATT&CK(enterprise), but we’re also going to compare these tools on usability, respective features, and more.Īll of these projects were clearly inspired by one another-and each is a great and useful contribution to the security community. Minimize downtime with after-hours supportĭoes it make sense to use both Red Canary’s Atomic Red Team and MITRE’s CALDERAfor adversary simulation? This exact question came up in the Atomic Red Team Slack channelrecently, and the lack of recent, available resources comparing these and other open source attack emulation platforms was immediately apparent.įor today’s blog, we’re going to take a look at technical differences, coverage disparities, and more comparisons between MITRE’s CALDERA, Red Canary’s Atomic Red Team, and Hunters Forge’s Mordor.Train continuously for real world situations.Operationalize your Microsoft security stack.Protect critical production Linux and Kubernetes.Protect your users’ email, identities, and SaaS apps.Protect your corporate endpoints and network.Deliver enterprise security across your IT environment.

Atomic Habits instal